<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>News in 2007 &#187; Internet, Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2k7.info/category/internet-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2k7.info</link>
	<description>Information on the interesting news in 2K7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:47:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Diversifying income sources</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/12/14/diversifying-income-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/12/14/diversifying-income-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/12/14/diversifying-income-sources/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flattening of Adsense revenues
I thought I was the only one facing this problem, but it seems to be widespread. If your revenues  do not increase whatever you do, it is time to move on. This year  I spent a lot of money on domains experimenting. Many things did not work out as expected, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google_adsense/3526822.htm">Flattening of Adsense revenues</a></p>
<p>I thought I was the only one facing this problem, but it seems to be widespread. If your revenues  do not increase whatever you do, it is time to move on. This year  I spent a lot of money on domains experimenting. Many things did not work out as expected, but I have managed to develop alternate sources of revenue (not from domain parking).  For other revenue sources, the income increases in proportion to the effort and time. There will also not be much competition also since not everyone can afford to spend so much initially to learn from their mistakes.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/12/14/diversifying-income-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IndiaTimes website &#8216;attacks visitors&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/11/30/indiatimes-website-attacks-visitors/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/11/30/indiatimes-website-attacks-visitors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/11/30/indiatimes-website-attacks-visitors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IndiaTimes website &#8216;attacks visitors&#8217; . One of the advantages of having your own websites is that you atleast know that your own websites are 100% safe. I rarely visit any of the &#8220;big&#8221; websites in India, because of these hidden dangers.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/10/india_times_under_attack/">IndiaTimes website &#8216;attacks visitors&#8217; </a>. One of the advantages of having your own websites is that you atleast know that your own websites are 100% safe. I rarely visit any of the &#8220;big&#8221; websites in India, because of these hidden dangers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/11/30/indiatimes-website-attacks-visitors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of paid links for PR?</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/10/31/end-of-paid-links-for-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/10/31/end-of-paid-links-for-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/10/31/end-of-paid-links-for-pr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Shoots Arrow Into Heart Of &#8220;Link Economy&#8221; .
The PR update is going on, and it seems the earlier formula for getting PR is no longer  valid. The author has correctly pointed out that if everyone is doing something, people feel it is correct, but that is not necessarily true.
Some of my websites have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.searchnewz.com/topstory/news/sn-2-20071026GoogleShootsArrowintoHeartofLinkEconomy.html">Google Shoots Arrow Into Heart Of &#8220;Link Economy&#8221;</a> .</p>
<p>The PR update is going on, and it seems the earlier formula for getting PR is no longer  valid. The author has correctly pointed out that if everyone is doing something, people feel it is correct, but that is not necessarily true.</p>
<p>Some of my websites have lost PR , some have gained PR . I have many websites and I don&#8217;t buy text links, so I think the criteria for assigning PR has changed. Till the market for links/traffic stabilises, I don&#8217;t think I will buy any more GTLD domains and concentrate on adding content. </p>
<p>Getting good content for a website takes a lot of time and effort, but atleast when I need some information in future, I know where I can find it online. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/10/31/end-of-paid-links-for-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Big&#8221; websites and original content</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/10/16/big-websites-and-original-content/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/10/16/big-websites-and-original-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/10/16/big-websites-and-original-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delhi HC Issues Stay Order Preventing e-Eighteen From Publishing Mint Column . Some of  the most &#8220;reputed&#8221; websites just copy content, and unfortunately with current search engine system, they rank higher than the original article writers. I have posted some information on my website and after a few days, other websites have reproduced it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.contentsutra.com/entry/419-delhi-hc-issues-stay-order-preventing-e-eighteen-from-publishing-mint-c/">Delhi HC Issues Stay Order Preventing e-Eighteen From Publishing Mint Column</a> . Some of  the most &#8220;reputed&#8221; websites just copy content, and unfortunately with current search engine system, they rank higher than the original article writers. I have posted some information on my website and after a few days, other websites have reproduced it and they rank higher in the SERPS.<br />
The algorithms do not recognise that the big portals usually hire content writers who are paid by word count, while a smaller site may have far more useful content written by a person interested in the subject. For many terms, about.com  ranks very high in the SERPs , but when you visit the website, you will find only 1-2 lines of  useful content. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/10/16/big-websites-and-original-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;IT superpower&#8221; with a shrinking Internet user base</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/10/06/the-it-superpower-with-a-shrinking-internet-user-base/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/10/06/the-it-superpower-with-a-shrinking-internet-user-base/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/10/06/the-it-superpower-with-a-shrinking-internet-user-base/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Net user base shrinks in India. 
Facts don&#8217;t lie, and though India incorrectly portrayed as a &#8220;IT superpower&#8221; by the mainstream media in India, it is the only country in the world with a shrinking internet user base. The speed of the internet connection on mobiles is close to zero based on my personal experience, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Infotech/Net_user_base_shrinks_as_Indians_go_mobile/articleshow/2433752.cms">Net user base shrinks in India. </a></p>
<p>Facts don&#8217;t lie, and though India incorrectly portrayed as a &#8220;IT superpower&#8221; by the mainstream media in India, it is the only country in the world with a shrinking internet user base. The speed of the internet connection on mobiles is close to zero based on my personal experience, it only causes RSI. One of the reasons is the lack of useful country specific applications, social networking online and gaming is a waste of time, what is the use of &#8220;friends&#8221; who probably have given a fake name and profile? </p>
<p>The other reason for the negative growth is the extremely poor quality service provided by most ISPs in India. There are some things in life that money cannot buy and one of these is getting a reliable high speed internet connection with customer service in India. Reviews on <a href="http://broadbandblog.in/">broadband</a> and <a href="http://ispr.in/">general ISPs</a>. If I pay for any service or product, I expect them to deliver what they promise, not waste my time and increase my BP trying to get customer service. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/10/06/the-it-superpower-with-a-shrinking-internet-user-base/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search engines and web content</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/10/03/search-engines-and-web-content/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/10/03/search-engines-and-web-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/10/03/search-engines-and-web-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word farms of the web . You know that this has become a real problem when you start getting offers for buying your websites , even without listing them for sale. Most human visitors recognise good content which is useful , search engine bots only check if they are &#8220;keyword rich&#8221; .
The current lot of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.searchengineworld.com/r/redirect.cgi?f=89&#038;d=3464931&#038;url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/sep/27/guardianweeklytechnologysection.internet">Word farms of the web</a> . You know that this has become a real problem when you start getting offers for buying your websites , even without listing them for sale. Most human visitors recognise good content which is useful , search engine bots only check if they are &#8220;keyword rich&#8221; .<br />
The current lot of search engines are extremely ineffective in recognising good content / useful sites. The sites I have spent the most time and effort writing content for are deindexed , including this one. Maybe something better will come up soon. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/10/03/search-engines-and-web-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain name theft</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/09/28/domain-name-theft/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/09/28/domain-name-theft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/09/28/domain-name-theft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web address theft is an everyday event . Some people spend a lot of money on valuable domain names and developing a single website, but the better your domain name or website, the more problems you are likely to face. If your site gets a lot of traffic, people will try to get it removed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119068079815138145.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Web address theft is an everyday event</a> . Some people spend a lot of money on valuable domain names and developing a single website, but the better your domain name or website, the more problems you are likely to face. If your site gets a lot of traffic, people will try to get it removed from search engines and it happens regularly. I still see a lot of &#8220;105&#8243; in my search terms, I think it is code to get websites dropped from search engines. </p>
<p>It is better to buy a large number of not so valuable domain names.Though the renewal fees will be higher, few will waste their time stealing the domain names, which  can only be sold for a few dollars more than their registration fee. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/09/28/domain-name-theft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/09/14/the-problem-with-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/09/14/the-problem-with-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/09/14/the-problem-with-search-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Link or Content &#8211; Which is the boss? Today if you have a new website with great content it is impossible to rank unless you have links from an &#8220;authority&#8221; site. So most of the websites today are created by hiring writers to create &#8220;keyword &#8221; rich articles, few really interesting websites rank well for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/search_engine_promotion/3447249.htm">Link or Content &#8211; Which is the boss? </a>Today if you have a new website with great content it is impossible to rank unless you have links from an &#8220;authority&#8221; site. So most of the websites today are created by hiring writers to create &#8220;keyword &#8221; rich articles, few really interesting websites rank well for many of the subjects I am interested in.</p>
<p>The current search engines rank &#8220;keyword rich&#8221; articles well and old websites well. For example if you search for any India related term , the first 10 search results will be the archived news of sites of major newspapers in India and rediff, which have been online for a long time. Almost all the newspapers get their news from the same press agencies, PTI / Reuters /AP or the same press release by a company&#8217;s PR agency. The search results will have the same text, only a different site design . So if you want to compile or compare information from different sources, search engines are not very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/09/14/the-problem-with-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why good content websites are penalised by Google</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/08/25/why-good-content-websites-are-penalised-by-google/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/08/25/why-good-content-websites-are-penalised-by-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/08/25/why-good-content-websites-are-penalised-by-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How A Third Party Can Remove Your Site From Google SERPsÂ 
Till October last year, I was getting a lot of traffic for my websites from Google, since then the traffic from Google has almost disappeared.Â Visitors to my websites who have found them useful, often post a link to them on forums and message boards, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Google proxy" href="http://www.seofaststart.com/blog/google-proxy-hacking/trackback" target="_blank">How A Third Party Can Remove Your Site From Google SERPs</a>Â </p>
<p>Till October last year, I was getting a lot of traffic for my websites from Google, since then the traffic from Google has almost disappeared.Â Visitors to my websites who have found them useful, often post a link to them on forums and message boards, so I was wondering what was wrong.Â </p>
<p>Â I had <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3142434.htm" target="_blank">specifically asked whether it was possible for a third party to get your site removed on Webmasterworld</a> but a Google Representative said that it was almost impossible for a third party to remove a website. Now my worst fears have been confirmed, some one has been systematically removing all my websites from Google&#8217;s index.</p>
<p>I often check my sites AWstats and I know that there are some people tracking many of my websites (may be just to see how effective they have been in getting my websites removed). I suppose they have spent a lot of time getting my websites removed from Search Engines, they have nothing better to do. This website has also been removed from Google&#8217;s index, though I never break any rules. Â </p>
<p>I see this happening all the time this year, you develop a good content website, it ranks in Search engines. Your competitors who fill their websites with keyword rich junk, getÂ your site removed from the search engine and you wonder what is wrong. SEO is a complete waste of time for Google.Â Â </p>
<p>Search engines are manipulated so easily to give junk results, in a few years some one will definitely develop a better way to find useful information on the internet.Â Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/08/25/why-good-content-websites-are-penalised-by-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millions of Addresses and Thousands of Sites, All Leading to One</title>
		<link>http://2k7.info/2007/06/01/millions-of-addresses-and-thousands-of-sites-all-leading-to-one/</link>
		<comments>http://2k7.info/2007/06/01/millions-of-addresses-and-thousands-of-sites-all-leading-to-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2k7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet, Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2k7.info/2007/06/01/millions-of-addresses-and-thousands-of-sites-all-leading-to-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Millions of Addresses and Thousands of Sites, All Leading to One
Having one large popular website may be easier to handle, but you are more likely to be targetted by competitors, who will spend a lot of time ensuring that you are removed from search engines.
If you have thousands of ( thousandsof is a nice domain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="website" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/28/technology/28ecom.html?_r=3&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin" target="_blank">Millions of Addresses and Thousands of Sites, All Leading to One</a></p>
<p>Having one large popular website may be easier to handle, but you are more likely to be targetted by competitors, who will spend a lot of time ensuring that you are removed from search engines.</p>
<p>If you have thousands of ( thousandsof is a nice domain name) websites, your traffic and income remains more consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2k7.info/2007/06/01/millions-of-addresses-and-thousands-of-sites-all-leading-to-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
